Economist: mobile phones have greatest impact for the developing world.
The leader in The Economist (12 March 2005, p. 11) and a report in the same issue (technology quarterly, p. 22-25) gives an update on the "digital divide" -- the idea that the poor would be left behind as the rich benfitted from new technologies.
The digital divide is a symptom of poverty, rather than a cause. As the newspaper notes, there is little point in giving a computer to people without electricity or with more pressing needs, such as food. The mobile phone, however, looks like it does have an impact on development. Phones do not need permanent electricity, can be used by the illiterate, can be shared and rented, and allow people to call markets to find out prices or to look for work. The mobile phone allows for bottom-up development in these places.
A study by Leonard Waverman at the London Business School found that an increase in the number of telephones in a population raised GDP by twice as much as primary school completion rates does. Although this does point towards the benefit of telecommunication, the Economist points out that other lower-costs technologies are also delivering information (e.g., the radio and printed newsletters).
The UN is meeting later this year to discuss funding for technology aid for the developing world. "The UN has set a goal of 50% access by 2015, but a new report by the World bank notes that 77% of the worlds population already lives within range of a mobile network."